Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Video: Kristen and Jesse Eisenberg for Variety's Directors on Directors

 


Jesse-Eisenberg_Kristen-Stewart-Variety-Directors-on-Directors.pngKristen-Stewart-Variety-Directors-on-Directors.png

Scans

G9frh60XgAAkapo.jpgG9fraswWAAACF1t.jpgG9frbTVXQAAhtu-.jpgG9frhJ8WEAAysHv.jpg

Click on images for a full view.

As featured in the print version of Variety December 2025. 

Transcript / Excerpt of the scans above:

“I swear to God. I’m going to kill myself,” Kristen Stewart says, ribbing her longtime friend Jesse Eisenberg for watching her directorial debut, “The Chronology of Water,” on his laptop.  

The “Twilight” star, who earned an Oscar nomination for portraying Princess Diana in “Spencer,” vowed to quit acting until she could adapt Lidia Yuknavitch’s 2011 stream-of-conscious memoir about a young woman (played by Imogen Poots), sexually abused as a child, who eventually finds her voice through writing and swimming. Stewart didn’t labor for nearly a decade to secure the film’s financing only for someone to see her passion project on a computer screen.  

“It’s supposed to be a sonic experience,” she sighs and keeps roasting Eisenberg. “You know about movies? Have you ever made a movie?” 

Stewart and Eisenberg met on 2009’s coming-of-age comedy “Adventureland” and reunited on 2015’s stoner adventure “American Ultra” and Woody Allen’s 2016 romantic drama “Cafe Society.” Since then, Eisenberg has directed two films, 2022’s dramedy “When You Finish Saving the World” and 2024’s Oscar-nominated “A Real Pain.” So yeah, he knows something about making movies, as well as a director’s desire for audiences to see them on the big screen. 

“I’m aware of that and was taking all of that into account,” Eisenberg wryly retorts before complimenting his pal. “I was astounded. I’ve never seen something made like this by someone I know who is also funny.” 

Stewart and Eisenberg continue to tease each other during their conversation, in which they discuss how directing has changed their perspective as actors and whether they care if their films make money.  

Jesse Eisenberg: Are you OK? 

Kristen Stewart: That should be the intro: “Are you OK?” I’m not kidding. That’s often how we greet each other. 

Eisenberg: We’ve known each other for a long time — 15 years, right? 

Stewart: I was 17 when we met. I’m 35. 

Eisenberg: Oh my God, really? I saw your movie 24 hours ago. I was blown away. My first thought was “We can do that? I didn’t know we could do that.” It’s unbelievably audacious. You read this book, but how did you convey it to other people? (I know these are junket questions.) What does the script look like?  

Stewart: You and I are fairly shy people, but there’s an innate, stifling invisibility that women have to grapple with, even if they weren’t abused by their father. I didn’t want to make statements, like, “This is what the movie’s about.” There was just something about the book that spoke to the universality of being a young girl trying to excavate a voice that’s been told to shut up.  

Eisenberg: You and I have the advantage of being known actors. It allows, or maybe gives, us the responsibility to make something that’s harder to convey. Is that part of the reason you were able to do something so abstract? The result is astounding, but that’s not guaranteed.  

Stewart: It wasn’t easy for me to make the movie. It took eight years. People that love me were genuinely sick and tired of hearing me be so upset about it. And then those things are baked into the plot of the movie. It’s about the malleability of our realities. I had to continuously remind people that we were doing a poem. 

Eisenberg: What I was asking before, if I can ask it better, is — 

Stewart: I can answer it better. 

Eisenberg: This is my question: Did you feel a responsibility to make something unusual because you’re a well-known actor, or is this just entirely your taste? 

Stewart: This is entirely my taste. I could never make something straightforward. I like associative, open-ended things that say something very particular but invite people to disagree.  

Eisenberg: How did your taste develop? 

Stewart: I don’t like being told what to do. I don’t want to tell people what to do. 

Eisenberg: I read something you said, which I thought was funny and reminded me of myself. Somebody asked you, “Do you think of being an actor in a movie differently now?” You’re like, “Of course. I’ll go to the director and say, ‘I’ll do whatever you want me to do.’”  

Stewart: I’ll never question anything again. I’m like, “Anything you want.” The idea of being like, “You should cast this person.” I’m like, “Excuse me? You don’t know anything.” 

Eisenberg: Isn’t that fascinating? A lot of people in our position go the other way. They feel even more like they need control because they have an experience where they were controlling everything. The story I always tell about you — because I’ve been asked about you for 18 years — is when we were doing “Adventureland,” there was a dramatic scene at night, and you were like, “Cut. I’m lying.” You were 17, and I was shocked. I felt like I was watching a master. Would you have done that now? 

Stewart: I get mad at people now for cutting, because I’m like, “I know you questioned yourself, but that moment of question was gold.” I want to try and not do that. [As an actor] I don’t want to be misinterpreted. When a director is like, “It seemed like you were feeling it.” I always say, “I don’t care if it looks good; I want to do it again.” I’m selfish. I want to taste it.  

Eisenberg: “I want the catharsis.” One of the other stories I tell from “Adventureland” was a quick scene. I had my first panic attack on set; I was self-aware in the worst way, and I shut down. After the tape, I was mortified. Greg [Mottola, the director] goes, “I didn’t notice, but I’m so sorry you felt that way.” He said, “I don’t understand how actors aren’t having panic attacks all the time. You’re in front of strangers, and you have to be vulnerable.” For years, I remember thinking, “It’s a sweet thing he said, but he’s pitying actors too much. We’re lucky. We have an easy job. We memorize lines.”  

Now I have respect for the job in a way I never did personally. Because I was so self-critical, I couldn’t have a good feeling about it. It seemed like, “You’re overpaying me.” Then Julianne Moore was in my movie, and after her first scene, I turned to my producer and was like, “Can we pay her more?” Did you have that feeling with Imogen? I’ve done three movies with her. But not in the same way I’ve done three movies with you. How did you choose her?  

Stewart: You’re one of the reasons. I was like, “I’m sure we would be close because you guys are friends.” She did an audition. She sent a tape and I was like, “Oh my God.” There’s something  about her being 35 and me being 35. We should have been friends since we were younger. We just never met. Then we did, and it was the perfect time to go, “We need to shove everything we’ve never said to each other into this movie.” 

Eisenberg: Do you feel you could have this style and use it going forward? 

Stewart: I’m always asked if I would continue to work as an actor in studio films, or if feels like you’re selling a homogenized idea that doesn’t land on an individual, necessarily, but satisfies a group? I wouldn’t be good at that job.  

Eisenberg What do you mean? To direct a more commercial thing? 

Stewart: More and more, commercial means standard and digestible. I want to be allowed to make movies that allow for time to figure out a structure and mission statement. The next movie I want to make utilizes different formats. Not because it’s nerdy film stuff, but because it’s more interesting to make movies about how you see something instead of what you see. 

Eisenberg: Your movie is coming out soon. Do you think or care about it making money?  

Stewart: It would be great if it did because then maybe it wouldn’t be as difficult to make my next movie. But at the same time, the next movie I want to make functions outside of the business structure we’re used to. People love to hear that. 

Eisenberg: “This doesn’t even exist in your structure.”  

Stewart: Well, it doesn’t. You need to find new terms for all of this because, I’m sorry, but the language and structure are oppressive.  

Eisenberg: There’s no English on this set. It doesn’t apply to what we’re doing. 

Stewart: Actually, the title of the movie is in Spanish. I’m not going to tell you what it is. 

Eisenberg: I wouldn’t understand it. 

Stewart: Yeah, you’re just a dummy. 

Eisenberg: So you care insofar as it helps you make the next one. You care insofar as it pays the people back who paid for it. But you’re not caring about what other people might think about it? People ask me too. I guess I don’t care about it being a successful business thing. My mind doesn’t go there, or I can’t conceive of it. 

Stewart: For sure. I love the movie. I birthed it. I probably would have made this movie if I was never an actor. I didn’t feel like I was graduating into like, “Now I want to check that box.” I think this thing needs to exist. 

Eisenberg: We’re directing everything, but we’re also desperate actors. So all I’ll say is this: I can learn Spanish for your next project. 

Stewart: You need to put yourself on tape. 

Source 1 2



Tuesday, December 30, 2025

Kristen will be featured on Variety's Directors on Directors series with Jesse Eisenberg - 6 January 2026

 


Variety’s Directors on Directors, presented by Klimon, returns on Jan. 5 with the visionaries behind some of this year’s biggest awards contenders.

Featured in this year’s Directors on Directors lineup are:  
  • Guillermo del Toro (“Frankenstein”) & Bradley Cooper (“Is This Thing On?”)  
  • Kristen Stewart (“The Chronology of Water”) & Jesse Eisenberg (“A Real Pain”)  
  • Ryan Coogler (“Sinners”) & Spike Lee (“Highest 2 Lowest”)  
  • ChloĆ© Zhao (“Hamnet”) & Josh Safdie (“Marty Supreme”)   
“Coming off our biggest Actors on Actors ever, these Directors on Directors conversations will continue to surprise and engage film fans around the world,” said Variety’s co-president and co-editor-in-chief Ramin Setoodeh. “The best way to kick off awards season in 2026 is through our latest video series.” 

The conversations will be released from Jan. 5-8 across Variety.com and its social media channels. The Directors on Directors print issue comes out on Dec. 31.   





Saturday, December 20, 2025

Kristen talks to W Magazine about 'The Chronology of Water'

The first time Kristen Stewart read The Chronology of Water, she thought, “Goddamnit, that’s what a movie should do. That’s why you make your first movie,” she tells W. That was nearly ten years ago—the book, a searing memoir of abuse and recovery by Lidia Yuknavitch, came out in 2011—and in the meantime, Stewart starred in over a dozen films, received Academy and Golden Globe nominations for her portrayal of Princess Diana in Spencer, and married the love of her life, screenwriter Dylan Meyer.

But all the while, the actor, beloved for her role in Twilight, kept Yuknavitch’s book in mind, writing her own adaptation for the screen. After securing funding and casting Imogen Poots in the lead role, Stewart made her film. And this past May, she debuted her adaptation of The Chronology of Water at the Cannes Film Festival, where it was nominated for the Un Certain Regard Award and Camera d’Or for first-time feature filmmakers.

“It’s about being allowed to say something,” Stewart says about making the film, currently in theaters in New York and Los Angeles with a wider release on January 9, 2026. Below, she talks directing her first feature, women reclaiming their stories, and the next three movies she has her sights on.

Why did it feel important to tell this story now?

It’s a tough movie to make, because it sounds like a story you’ve heard before and don’t need to be dragged through again. “Woman flees abusive home and through swimming and art finds salvation after substance abuse.”

But the reason the book is so enlightening is that it focuses on how people see things and not what they see. Even though it’s a memoir and it’s hyperspecific about one woman, it’s about breaking form, and repossessing the terms and the words that have defined you and your worth for your whole fucking life. Women were really only allowed to be educated very recently, so those words weren’t created by us.

The movie took a long time to get funding and get made—eight years, you’ve said.

It was a really hard fucking sell. It was so much more difficult to read the script than it was to have incredibly striking, searing images embedded into your body that you’re never going to forget. It was easier to make the movie and show it to people than to get people to pay me millions of dollars to do so.

Did you have visual references?

I had such a visual experience with the book, and my references substantiated those instincts. But they did come from the inside. I mean, I love Lynne Ramsay, Tarkovsky. I love experimental film. I love Barbara Hammer.

But also, just having a little bit of faith in your own dreams—this is so pretentious, but you see shit when you close your eyes. That’s like watching a movie. It’s a meta thing because the movie is about not doubting yourself and allowing your own narrative to self-formulate and not be knocked off its path. That’s the crux of the tension in the movie: It's not what her dad does, it’s not what the husband does, it’s not the baby. It’s like, is she going to be able to finish the sentence? Are we going to get the book that we’re experiencing, or is she going to fuck it up? Is she going to write herself into being or is she going to doubt herself again?

You’ve spent much of your career in front of the camera. What was it like to not only step behind the lens but also to manage the whole production?

It’s important to dispel this mythology surrounding the authoritarianism of a director. Nobody can do everything by themselves. A good crew is so connected that there’s no hierarchy. The coolest thing about directing is being the kickstarter. I’ve been around directors on set, and I’ve seen this drive manifest in a look in their eye that just is like, “Holy shit, they’re unstoppable. I want to go where they're going.” It makes you want to prove that you figured out how to want it as bad. I’ve done that as an actress since I was fucking nine years old. The coolest part about being on the other side is being this conjurer. You get to get everyone going.

Is this the first of many films you’ll be directing?

Oh my god, yeah. I’m dying [to direct more]. I’m attached to some incredible projects as an actor, too, that have taken a long time to find themselves. [Directing] is such a huge responsibility, and it’s so scary, but I feel a gnawing in the other direction. I love being an actor, and I can’t wait or whatever the fuck, but I’m writing three movies, and I want to make them yesterday.

Do those movies share any themes?

I’m so fucking disinterested in watching people do things. I hate pedantic filmmaking. I hate the morality of the three-act structure. It’s crazy how we keep watching the same movie over and over, and just how chained-up they all feel. I want to make a big, huge experimental film, but I want it to be hyper-commercial.

Source

Kristen attends a post-screening Q&A for 'The Chronology of Water' and after-party in LA - 18 December 2025

 


IMG_2209.JPGIMG_2208.JPGIMG_2211.JPGIMG_2207.JPGIMG_2212.JPG

G8gs14KakB46zA_.jpgG84SL8ZagAQFSOG.jpg
IMG_2352.JPGIMG_2354.JPGIMG_2351.JPGIMG_2350.JPGIMG_2348.JPGIMG_2353.JPGIMG_2356.JPGIMG_2349.JPGIMG_2357.JPGIMG_2355.JPG

IMG_2478.JPGIMG_2484.JPGIMG_2479.JPGIMG_2476.JPGIMG_2482.JPGIMG_2487.JPGIMG_2485.JPGIMG_2473.JPGIMG_2481.JPGIMG_2488.JPGIMG_2486.JPGIMG_2480.JPGIMG_2483.JPGIMG_2472.JPG

BTS

IMG_2191.JPGIMG_2202.JPGIMG_2194.JPGIMG_2190.JPGIMG_2201.JPGIMG_2193.JPGIMG_2198.JPGIMG_2196.JPGD5455D94-660F-4AF2-B66B-887684F12717.jpegIMG_2200.JPG8F8589D1-A65B-4D17-BBC0-423AB3F28DD0.jpegIMG_2197.JPGIMG_2195.JPG

Click on the photo for full view.


Source 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9