Sunday, May 25, 2025

Reviews: 'The Chronology of Water' at the Cannes Film Festival 2025

 


Click on the link for each source for the full review.

Indiewire

When famous actors decide to try their hand at filmmaking, the results can be — and often are — unremarkable by design. Timid and safe with a network TV aesthetic that screams “I’m a lot more afraid behind the camera than I am in front of it.” Not so of Kristen Stewart’s “The Chronology of Water.” Not in the slightest. Some movies are shot. This one was directed. 

There isn’t a single millisecond of this movie that doesn’t bristle with the raw energy of an artist who’s found the permission she needed to put her whole being into every frame, messy and shattered as that might be. 

The Film Stage

“Flowing” is perhaps the word that best describes Chronology of Water, but not in a vacuously metaphorical way. Kristen Stewart has instead managed to translate the flow of words through that of images and sound, to show a filmmaking fluid and strong-willed like a river that becomes more forceful with obstacles in its way. Dynamism and movement is what defines cinema as an art, too, and while this may be a truism, it takes both mastery and discipline to make form fit content so perfectly, on such an elemental level.

Le Bleu du Miroir (in French)

For her directorial debut, selected for Un Certain Regard , Kristen Stewart enters through the front door, with the aplomb of artists who proclaim their convictions and assume their perspective, their voice. With The Chronology of Water , she signs a powerful first film, a visceral representation of female experiences and the power of writing in the long process of healing after the sound and the fury.

Les InRocks (in French):

Kristen Stewart's directorial debut, "The Chronology of Water," is a crashing wave. Stunningly beautiful and radically powerful.

It grabs you like a wave, puts your head under water, releases it, catches you, etc. It's a great film.

Roger Ebert:

Eight years in the making, Stewart’s truly miraculous “The Chronology of Water” adapts Lidia Yuknavitch’s 2011 memoir of the same name into a ferocious, full-throated cri de cœur without sacrificing so much as a molecule of the source material’s bracing physicality and emotional force. Not taking on the lead role herself but imbuing every frame of this film with the tensile strength we’ve come to admire in her as an actor, Stewart instead directs Imogen Poots to the greatest performance of her career. 

Deadline

The film she has made is simultaneously raw and intricately constructed, as precise and potentially perilous as a Jenga skyscraper. So much visual and aural artifice could easily collapse in on itself, but it holds steady. On so many levels, it is to be admired. Stewart has successfully found a form to match the spiky, visceral quality of Yuknavitch’s prose, as evidenced by readings within the film, and its primary subject: trauma. 

Hollywood Authentic

Stewart has described her film presented to Cannes as a ‘first draft’ and in that regard it could use some corralling; but equally, like Lidia, it shows fierce potential. As Kesey notes, ‘you can write, girl’.

Geek Vibes Nation

The boldness and braveness of Stewart as a director and writer are apparent from the start. She decided to film on grainy 16mm and, together with co-writer Andy Mingo (Romance, The Iconographer), she turned the film’s source material, the abuse memoir by Lidia Yuknavitch, into a striking script worth being adapted.

Stewart takes you on a rollercoaster of different tones, emotions and kaleidoscopic colours in the most remarkable way. 

Loud and Clear

Kristen Stewart’s directorial debut is a living, breathing piece of art. It’s a masterful translation of an impossibly difficult life that, while deeply dark, never gives up on the possibility of finding the light.  

The Hollywood Reporter

There’s a beguiling dichotomy in Kristen Stewart’s accomplished first feature as writer-director — between the dreamlike haze and fragmentation of memory and the raw wound of trauma so vivid it will always be with you. 

Screenrant

For her feature directorial debut, Kristen Stewart returned to Cannes for the seventh time to show us what she’s made of behind the camera. And show us she did. The Chronology of Water is a boisterous spectacle of the female experience directed with pure love and sincerity.

The Upcoming

...there’s no denying Stewart’s sincerity or her clear-eyed commitment to the material. The Chronology of Water may lack the smooth current of a conventional narrative, but it beats with conviction. It’s a bold, promising debut that suggests Stewart is more than willing to dive into the deep end.

Rolling Stone

If this is the first of many filmmaking endeavors from Stewart, however, we welcome everything that is to come. She’s proven that she’s not afraid to draw blood. And that, in the end, she understands the art of making images flow together in a way that feels just south of transcendent. 

Variety

Okay, now Kristen Stewart is just showing off.

The Oscar nominated “Spencer” star steps behind the camera, writing and directing “The Chronology of Water,” [...] A portrait of pain, rebirth and reclamation, the film’s heartbeat comes from Stewart’s skillful and natural filmmaking. 

Decider

Kristen Stewart’s The Chronology of Water rebukes the “vanity project” label often foisted on first time actors-turned-directors with its harsh, disorienting cuts, yielding an immensely uncomfortable movie. Elliptical in structure, but precise in its telling, Stewart’s masterful debut begins with brief, impressionistic flashes of blood from a sudden miscarriage running down the shower drain, alongside the agonizing wails of its protagonist: Yuknavitch, as played by English actress Imogen Poots. 

The Playlist

It is a powerhouse performance [Imogen Poots] that roots a film that merits it, and signals Stewart as just as interesting a directorial voice as she is a performer.

Vogue Magazine

The Chronology of Water takes its haunting title from American author Lidia Yuknavitch’s 2011 memoir. And yet, few films feel as deeply personal as this debut by Kristen Stewart, who emerges here as a natural filmmaker.

Screendaily

As a director, Stewart has a keen eye for the immediacy of everyday life. And as The Chronology Of Water reaches its hopeful conclusion, the director produces some of her finest sequences, including one in which Yuknavitch’s father returns to her orbit, proving to be a much different man than in her youth. 

Timeout

Kristen Stewart reveals a deft directorial hand and a distinct, languid, echoing style in her vividly made, emotionally visceral exploration of the life and times of American novelist Lidia Yuknavitch. 

The Guardian

But for all that, and some callow indie indulgences, this is an earnest and heartfelt piece of work, and Stewart has guided strong, intelligent performances.

The Observer

The strongest parts of The Chronology of Water are those character reveals—especially the quieter ones, when a wrung-out Yuknavitch, after a punishing gauntlet of sex, drugs, and alcohol, slowly finds the path to redemption by writing her way out of personal oblivion. That’s when Stewart’s dogged devotion to the source material shines though in a way that signals a major filmmaking talent.

Vanity Fair

For her feature directorial debut, the actor Kristen Stewart has chosen to adapt a tough, lyrical memoir about a woman trying to out-swim a traumatic childhood and addiction. In The Chronology of Water, the writer Lidia Yuknavitch details the sexual abuse she experienced at the hands of her father and its long aftermath, from a scuttled competitive swimming career to new purpose found, years later, in writing. It’s a difficult piece, but Stewart has shown in her acting work that she’s a fan of daunting tasks.


Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Video: Kristen and Imogen Poot's four favorites with Letterboxd at the Cannes Film Festival

 

Video: Kristen and Imogen Poots interview with Time at the Cannes Film Festival for 'The Chronology of Water'

 

Kristen on the cover of Les Inrocks (France) Cannes Film Festival Issue

 

GrUi8BlbUAAidn9.jpg

Click on cover for full view.

Kristen Stewart returns to the Cannes Film Festival this year as a director to present her first feature film, “The Chronology of Water.”

At the Cannes Film Festival, Kristen Stewart presented her directorial debut, the adaptation of Lidia Yuknavitch's memoir, The Chronology of Water , in the Un Certain Regard category ( read our review here ). We spoke with the new filmmaker about feminism, violence, and beauty.

During the presentation of the film, you emphasized the impact that The Chronology of Water will have on our bodies.

Having a female body is a political act, a radical act. It takes real energy to keep getting back up. It might sound dramatic, but it's the truth. It's okay to rely on hyperbole here. The only reason we don't is because no one wants to hear it. It would be disgusting. But we can make it fun. The film deals with a very difficult subject, and our goal was to give ourselves an electric shock and laugh hysterically. The last time I saw the film, there was deathly silence in the theater. And I was like, "But wait, this is funny!"

There are so many things about this film that I find funny and exciting. I was a little worried people wouldn't understand... The goal was to listen to our feelings, our impressions, and let them guide us into unknown territories. When I watch Imogen Poots ejaculate against her childhood bedroom door, I could fly. I can't believe we did that.

How did you discover this text by Lidia Yuknavitch?

I read it when I was 25, maybe 26. I already had a long career behind me. People were asking me questions. I had platforms to speak. But I was starting to feel like I hadn't said much, that I hadn't been very honest, even though I am honest, sometimes excessively so. There are topics that seem steeped in shame, that you're not supposed to articulate.

There's this scene in the film where Lidia Yuknavitch (Imogen Poots) reads from her book on stage in public. She can barely speak. Her voice comes out in writing. She can't externalize it. It's a very internal thing. She says it started to piss her off that she had a hole. Suddenly, she realizes she's saying it in front of an audience. She catches herself, swallows her anger. If you say things too brutally, people don't listen. The idea was to make it beautiful. Some violent things can be beautiful.

The fault line between pain and pleasure is blatant. It's okay that bad things have happened to you. You have to recategorize them, reclaim them through words. It's de-stigmatizing. Everyone has had disgusting sexual experiences—even if you haven't been abused in that way, even if you haven't had an experience of violence, as a woman, as a queer person, rape is endless, it happens daily. It creeps into the images we consume, into media conversations, into our oppressive patriarchal society. I say that and people say, oh, more feminist bullshit! It feels good to find a way to get up, set your hair on fire, take all your clothes off, come really hard in public, and say, “Look, this is actually cool!” For my first film, I thought that's what I had to do.

You use a lot of cut-ups; the editing of your film is very fragmented. Is this something that comes from the book by Lidia Yuknavitch that you're adapting, or something you came up with yourself?

The book is an experience of broken pieces being reassembled. It's an incredible emotional mosaic. It's funny because that's what movies do. Movies can be like dreams; they're the only format that does that. Making a film from this book was very satisfying because it's one of my favorite texts. It's an active work, which made me understand that it's okay to explore yourself, to explore others, and to do it loudly. It's healthy. It's stifling to live in a woman's body and have your inner voice constantly told to shut up. I know how it feels. We all have physical memories that come up every day like flashes.

When you read what people say about the book, it's often diminished. What happened to her? Oh, she was sexually abused by her father and found an outlet through swimming and literature. That's not what it's about. It's about what happens to all of us and how we categorize that pain. How we can reframe it, relabel it through the words we say to ourselves and others in order to transform that pain into pleasure. All our desires are completely bastilled from a very young age. Women don't decide what they like. It's imposed on us. So you have to understand why these mechanisms are there and reclaim them. Otherwise, you're screwed.

The Chronology Of Water  by Kristen Stewart with Imogen Poots, Thora Birch, James Belushi – Un Certain Regard – with the support of Chanel

Source

Video: Allocine interview at the Cannes Film Festival

 

Source

Monday, May 19, 2025

Video: Kristen, Thora Birch and Imogen Poots in the Deadline studio at the Cannes Film Festival for 'The Chronology of Water'


Kristen Stewart thinks it’s time we got real. “We get prescribed stories just shoved into our faces, down our throats,” she said during a panel at the Deadline’s Cannes Film Festival studio.

Stewart was talking specifically about narratives around the female experience as portrayed in her directorial debut The Chronology of Water, which premiered at Cannes in Un Certain Regard this week.

The Chronology of Water was adapted by Stewart and Andy Mingo from Lidia Yuknavitch’s memoir of the same name. Lidia (Imogen Poots) experiences horrific trauma and abuse, first beginning in her childhood home, while her older sister Claudia (Thora Birch) is forced to leave home “to save her own life” and escape their abusive father (Michael Epp).

Stewart said she was determined to show Lidia’s journey in all its rawness and to present Lidia’s story in a way that is rooted in truth. “The reason that I wanted to make this was to screw with form, because it’s not about what happened to Lidia Yuknavitch, it’s what happens to us all and how we can internalize that violence. I know it sounds dramatic, but it’s true. It’s incredibly violent to be a woman.”

She took aim at accepted norms within female representation on screen: “The imagery that we consume, the conversations that are not allowed, the fact that we can’t tell people when we’re bleeding, like it’s gross or something.”

Poots recalled coming to the role of Lidia after receiving an email from Stewart out of the blue. The two had only known each other peripherally and had never met. The email was just one line, Stewart revealed. It said simply, “Dude, do you want to make this movie with me?”

Poots was immediately gripped by the script. “You just don’t read things like that,” she said. “Or if you do read scripts like that, they’re not getting made. And so it was just this living, breathing document. It was just such a miracle that we ended up making this film. It’s extraordinary.”

But, as Birch pointed out, the fact that it took eight years for Stewart to get the film made is “absurd” and that telling these kinds of stories in a real way “should be normal.”

Stewart has hope for the future of female narratives, however. “We broke the seal,” she said. “Hopefully we can start flooding, gushing into view.”

Source

Sunday, May 18, 2025

Video: Interview with Konbini at the Cannes Film Festival for 'The Chronology of Water'


Source

Interview with Vanity Fair France for 'The Chronology of Water' at the Cannes Film Festival

 

IMG_6799.jpegIMG_6800.jpeg

Click on photos for full view.

Vanity Fair. How did you experience the premiere screening and the standing ovation?

Kristen Stewart . It's funny to say this, but I've had several standing ovations in my life. Whenever the camera pans to the actors, I always think, "Oh my God, go to the director! I didn't have much to do with this." I have a hard time owning that space, and I always have a lot of respect for the director. This time, I did the opposite, redirecting the focus to my actress, Imogen Poots . She brought her whole being into our film. The plot could be summed up on the surface of her skin. I could literally cry thinking about her.

You were the first person to hug Thierry Frémaux…

I jumped on him (laughs). At the same time, he was standing right there, it was a bit of an invitation. The enthusiasm of the Americans may or may not hit the mark, but I think the moment was right for it.

The Chronology of Water was originally an autobiography by Lidia Yuknavitch. Why do you recommend discovering her work?

Read her short stories. The words this woman wrote in her youth are reassuring, but also strikingly violent. Her fiction, especially the more bizarre and recent ones, are full of intuition, as if she knew things we didn't. She helped so many people find their own voice, but she also lifted the veil on taboo subjects that are omnipresent in our lives. You read her novels and it's as if they were written on tissue paper that has been bitten, spat on, drenched in blood and tears, but where the words still shine through. She is a great artist.

What was the first image that came to mind when you read the book?

There are two quotes that stood out to me: "I became water" and "Can you hold life and death in the same sentence?" Neither of them is in the film, because it already expresses these ideas through the images and a kind of cumulative experience. But visually, I would say a motif of water full of foam. I needed Imogen Poots to play the character because she has these blue eyes, this voluptuous body, this openness. But she's also a shark: she's very focused and incredibly intelligent. You can't hire an actor to play a writer unless they have a literary mind somewhere. The first time I read the book, I was in the shower with the character, bleeding. I wanted that blood to have pebbles and stick to the tiles so there would be absolutely no doubt about its origin.

There was already this water motif in your short film Come Swim . Where did this obsession come from?

It's a complete coincidence. I hadn't read The Chronology of Water when I made Come Swim . The short film is about the idea of ​​accepting that you're floating, letting yourself go, not fighting tooth and nail to keep your head above water. Personally, I hate water, I don't like swimming, I even wear Doc Martens on the beach. I probably need to swim and let myself go a little more. Maybe that's why I was drawn to this theme.

Lidia Yuknavitch gave a Ted Talk about the beauty of being an outsider. Do you think you're an outsider in Hollywood , or do you like outsiders?

I've always liked outsiders. It often feels like only certain people are allowed to take up space. That idea is violently patriarchal. My film loves men as much as women. It's a feminist feature, but it also celebrates the beauty of our relationships. And the importance of being seen by the right person. Even if your dad is an asshole, you want him to tell you he's proud of you. You have to learn to look at yourself, to be honest with yourself. It's a little scary; it's like having a target on your forehead. But it's necessary, or we risk denying our own lives and ceasing to exist.

Source 1 2

Kristen's interview with Trois Couleurs France for 'The Chronology of Water'

Google translated

What was the first image that came to you while preparing  The Chronology of Water  ?

A blood clot, coagulated blood, impossible to mistake for anything else. This blood doesn't come from a wound. It comes from an orifice, an orifice that we're constantly made to feel shouldn't exist or that we can't look at it, talk about it, hear about it, get anything from it that isn't stolen. I had written down a lot of ideas, jotted down lines and lines, not all of which necessarily make it into the film. The images sort of took over the writing. But the first thing I wrote on a piece of paper was: "I have become water." And also: "Can we hold life and death in the same sentence?"

Your film talks about trauma that doesn't go away, but also about how we can convert it into art, into writing. What interests you about this subject?

There are secrets we keep that destroy us. When I say "we," I mean women, who hoard, constantly deny themselves, and tell themselves to keep quiet. Certain texts, certain encounters, certain works help us find our voice and encourage us to finally listen to ourselves. This is precisely what  Lidia Yuknavitch's The Chronology of Water does  , in a radical, compelling way. This book is very popular; it has a veritable cult following. It is adored because people perceive it as a help. It is a lifeboat.

Your character, loosely based on Lidia's autobiographical text  [published in 2014 in France under the title La Mécanique des fluides]  is a complex novelist, driven by a desire for life but also for death. What do you understand about her?

She's a voracious character. I see her as a bottomless pit, full of many things. She has developed a desire for violence that doesn't entirely belong to her. Our desires aren't always developed by us alone, you know... They're imposed on us by external hazards, which we can't control. Having a woman's body in our world, being subjected to the representations of our own body, being subjected to the conversations that take place without us, and about us, leads us to integrate violence, even when we don't identify with it. I feel like I'm writing you a poem  [laughs.]  We have to engage with these issues, and that's what Lidia does. Her early  short stories [ Caverns  in 1990 and  Her Other Mouths  in 1997, editor's note]  are so violent, so striking, so beautifully porous… They suck you in and allow you to project yourself into every crevice, every unspeakable experience, even if you can't identify with every detail. I felt like this woman was screaming something I had internalized for a long time. I wanted to join in this kind of rebellious scream… And I'm certainly not alone in this. I'm convinced that if I feel this way, it's because many other people do.

We get the feeling that you wanted to destroy the usual codes of the biopic, by imposing a collage of images that sometimes border on the experimental and abstract. Why?

Yes, the film isn't so much about Lidia's life. It's about us, collectively. I didn't want a plot, but rather a mix of experiences gathered by someone trying to reclaim an identity and their body. The only way to honor the book was to allow the film to have a life of its own. The film is made of stitched, ephemeral memories. It feels like a dream I don't completely control. I didn't try to be faithful to the book, but even so, I think it's a faithful adaptation. The form had to be as revolutionary as the book. And mind you, I'm not calling the film "revolutionary"... I'm not self-proclaiming. I wanted everyone to be able to invest themselves, to project themselves, because that's the only reason we watch films: to feel experiences that are foreign to us, that are beyond us.

You use a lot of images of sewing, scarification, scars.

My character gets injured because she wants to imprint her pain on the outside. Like Lidia, the film had to have scars, which can be read like body Braille. And the reading can be different for everyone. I don't want to impose the story at all. I just want people to feel it, to feel encouraged to listen to themselves, to look at themselves, and to bleed in public.

It took you years to write and then produce this film. Why do you think that is?

Because no one wants to listen to women, to their stories. It doesn't sell. Because it's a "difficult subject." But if I never gave up on this project, it's because I wanted to show people that it can be liberating, even funny, to talk about these painful subjects. It's fun, to reveal secrets. It's funny, I wonder if I should say that about the film, but yes, the film is also about how funny it is, isn't it, to celebrate yourself, to watch yourself come? It's enjoyable to watch fluids gushing out, without being embarrassed, and to feel that the reappropriation of this shame can be transformed into an astonishing, noisy song that we can sing together. And that's a film.

Source